Popular Posts

Showing posts with label allergies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label allergies. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 22, 2015

FLU VACCINE for All: A Critical Look at the Evidence

Of note, Immunization, Obesity, Illiteracy and High School drop out are actual priorities worldwide!

Allergy & Clinical Immunology

Flu Vaccine for All: A Critical Look at the Evidence

Eric A. Biondi, MD, MS; C. Andrew Aligne, MD, MPH
Disclosures | December 21, 2015

When Vaccination Became Routine

Vaccine proponents felt that the failure of the vaccine was explained by the immunization campaign being too little, too late. As a result, in 1960, national health experts recommended, for the first time, routine annual vaccination, with emphasis on high-risk groups, including those over the age of 65 years and individuals with chronic illness.[13] By the early 1960s, routine influenza vaccination was generally adopted as a policy, with very little supporting evidence.
After several years of this policy, the CDC decided to evaluate its impact. In 1964, Alexander Langmuir, MD, MPH, then the chief epidemiologist at the CDC, published a paper[13] that "reluctantly concluded that there is little progress to be reported. The severity of the epidemic of 1962-1963...demonstrates the failure to achieve effective control of excess mortality." The paper questioned whether widespread influenza immunization "should be continued without better evidence to justify the major costs to the general public." Despite this, annual vaccination campaigns were continued.
In 1968, the CDC finally performed a randomized, double-blind trial[14] to examine the effect of vaccination on morbidity and mortality. The authors concluded that "Despite extensive use of influenza vaccines...attainment of [improved morbidity and mortality] has never been demonstrated." Nevertheless, flu immunization continued.
In 1976, H1N1 "swine flu" appeared, and a large-scale effort to immunize as many Americans as possible was launched.[15] However, the anticipated levels of disease did not appear, and an epidemic of paralytic Guillain-Barré syndrome in recipients of vaccine led to the program's cancellation. An analysis in 1977[16] by the CDC concluded that influenza control had been "generally ineffective" and that statistically valid community trials were needed.
In 1995, a major review from the US Food and Drug Administration acknowledged the ongoing "paucity of randomized trials" and warned about serious methodological flaws in many existing flu vaccine studies.[17]
In 2000, the CDC performed a placebo-controlled trial and found that "vaccination [when compared to placebo] may not provide overall economic benefit in most years."[18]
Nonetheless, in 2004, the AAP recommended annual influenza immunization for young children, household contacts, and healthcare providers.[19]
Vaccination coverage recommendations continued to expand, and now during every flu season, we watch commercials by retail pharmacies telling us about the importance of getting the flu shot. The fact that the AAP recommends "mandatory" flu vaccination for healthcare providers[20] means that eventually clinicians could be fired for not getting vaccinated.

Summing Up the Data

A 2012 systematic review and meta-analysis[21] examined the efficacy and effectiveness of licensed influenza vaccines in patients with confirmed influenza illness. The authors confirmed that the original "recommendation to vaccinate the elderly was made without data for vaccine efficacy or effectiveness." The main message was that we need a better vaccine and better studies to demonstrate its effectiveness.
Despite the lack of high-quality data supporting the value of the flu shot, widespread vaccination policy might still be reasonable if observational studies consistently showed a benefit. However, the observational studies cited by flu shot proponents are frequently flawed.[22-28] In many studies, relevant clinical outcomes are ignored in favor of immunogenicity (ie, the ability to elicit an antibody response). "Influenza-like illness" (ie, cold symptoms) is frequently measured instead of serious outcomes, such as pneumonia or death. When these more serious outcomes are examined, there is often a failure to control for healthy user bias—the propensity for healthier people to do such things as receive annual check-ups, eat healthier foods, and get the flu shot. So, although it's true that people who get flu shots live longer, it may have nothing to do with actually getting the flu shot.
A 2005 study of a 33-season, national data set attempted to reconcile the reduced all-cause morbidity and mortality found in some observational studies of influenza vaccination with the fact that "national influenza mortality rates among seniors increased in the 1980s and 1990s as the senior vaccination coverage quadrupled."[29] In this study, the authors conclude that:
"[Our] estimates, which provide the best available national estimates of the fraction of all winter deaths that are specifically attributable to influenza, show that the observational studies must overstate the mortality benefits of the vaccine...[even during two pandemic seasons] the estimated influenza-related mortality was probably very close to what would have occurred had no vaccine been available."
The rationale for flu immunization as a national health priority is that influenza is a disease with serious complications, such as pneumonia, hospitalization, and death.[5,13,28] If the reason for influenza vaccination is that flu is such a serious disease, then the relevant outcomes are whether vaccination improves morbidity and mortality from flu. However, after decades of vaccine use, it is hard to detect any public health impact. This is in stark contrast to other routine vaccinations, such as polio and Haemophilus influenzae type b, where introduction of the vaccine led to obvious decline of the disease.
We are pediatricians, and we believe in childhood immunizations. Many vaccines have provided immense public health value. We simply question whether the policy of routine influenza vaccination has outpaced the data supporting its use.
Influenza vaccination now supersedes many other priorities of public health (such as obesity, illiteracy, and high school dropout), and we question whether so much time, effort, and money should be dedicated to flu vaccination while these other national healthcare priorities remain on the back burner.
2 of 2

Wednesday, September 30, 2015

WHAT IS NEW IN DERMATOLOGY 2015 ?



What's new in dermatology
Disclosures: Abena O Ofori, MD Nothing to disclose. Rosamaria Corona, MD, DSc Nothing to disclose.
Contributor disclosures are reviewed for conflicts of interest by the editorial group. When found, these are addressed by vetting through a multi-level review process, and through requirements for references to be provided to support the content. Appropriately referenced content is required of all authors and must conform to UpToDate standards of evidence.
All topics are updated as new evidence becomes available and our peer review process is complete.
Literature review current through: Aug 2015. | This topic last updated: Sep 24, 2015.
The following represent additions to UpToDate from the past six months that were considered by the editors and authors to be of particular interest. The most recent What's New entries are at the top of each subsection.
ACNE AND ROSACEA
Serum potassium monitoring during spironolactone therapy for acne (March 2015)
Spironolactone is an androgen receptor antagonist that is effective for the treatment of acne in females. Although periodic monitoring of serum potassium levels is often performed during treatment with spironolactone, there is uncertainty about the need for monitoring in young, healthy acne patients. A large retrospective study comparing the rate of hyperkalemia during treatment with spironolactone with baseline rates of hyperkalemia in women with acne (ages 18 to 45) did not find increased rates of hyperkalemia during spironolactone therapy, suggesting that periodic monitoring of serum potassium in healthy women is not necessary [1]. These results cannot be applied to patients who may be at increased risk for hyperkalemia due to heart failure, renal disease, concomitant medical therapy, or other conditions. (See "Hormonal therapy for women with acne vulgaris", section on 'Side effects'.)
ATOPIC DERMATITIS AND OTHER DERMATITIS
Acute worsening of atopic dermatitis due to aeroallergen exposure (July 2015)
Environmental allergens are a trigger of atopic dermatitis (AD) in a small subset of children and adults. Patients who have environmental allergies as a trigger of AD have persistent disease with chronic exposure to an allergen in the environment. A small study of adults with AD demonstrated that exposure to grass pollen in an environmental challenge chamber for two consecutive days resulted in a significant worsening of AD on exposed skin for the five days after challenge compared with exposure to clean air (placebo) [2]. This study shows that an isolated exposure to an aeroallergen can cause an acute flare of AD in sensitized individuals. (See "Role of allergy in atopic dermatitis (eczema)", section on 'Aeroallergens'.)
Pimecrolimus for atopic dermatitis in infants and young children (May 2015)
Topical calcineurin inhibitors have been approved in the United States as second-line therapies for the treatment of mild to moderate atopic dermatitis (AD) in adults and children ≥2 years. However, they have been used off-label as first-line treatment for AD in younger children and infants, in the absence of long-term studies evaluating their efficacy and safety. A five-year randomized, open-label trial evaluated the safety and long-term efficacy of pimecrolimus 1% cream compared with low or mid-potency topical corticosteroids in over 2400 infants with mild to moderate AD [3]. After five years, overall treatment success was achieved in approximately 90 percent of children in both groups. Growth, immune function, and cancer rates were similar in the two groups, as were overall rates of adverse events. However, episodes of bronchitis, infected eczema, impetigo, and nasopharyngitis were slightly more frequent in the pimecrolimus group, and the rates of cutaneous adverse events (eg, skin irritation, atrophy, telangiectasias) were not reported. Thus, the advantage of using pimecrolimus rather than low to mid-potency topical corticosteroids in this age group remains unclear. (See "Treatment of atopic dermatitis (eczema)", section on 'Off-label use in infants'.)
Unclear association between atopic dermatitis and lymphoma (May 2015)
The association between atopic dermatitis and lymphoma is controversial. A 2015 systematic review and meta-analysis of four cohort studies and 18 case-control studies found a modest increase in the risk of lymphoma in patients with atopic dermatitis compared with the general population [4]. The risk increase was significant in the meta-analysis of the cohort studies but not in the case-control studies. However, the large heterogeneity of case-control studies in study design and diagnostic criteria does not allow any definite conclusion. In particular, due to overlapping clinical features, cases of cutaneous T cell lymphoma may have been initially misdiagnosed and treated as severe atopic dermatitis. (See "Pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis of atopic dermatitis (eczema)", section on 'Risk of lymphoma'.)
Depression and anxiety disorders in patients with atopic dermatitis (April 2015)
Several lines of evidence suggest that the incidence of psychiatric comorbidities, including major depression and anxiety disorders, is increased among patients with atopic dermatitis and may be influenced by factors such as perceived disease severity and quality of life. A longitudinal cohort study evaluated the risk of developing major depression or anxiety disorders later in life among more than 8000 adolescents and adults with atopic dermatitis and age- and sex-matched controls [5]. Patients with atopic dermatitis had a six- and fourfold increased risk of developing major depression or anxiety disorders, respectively. These findings suggest that the identification and treatment of psychiatric comorbidities are important aspects of the management of patients with atopic dermatitis. (See "Pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis of atopic dermatitis (eczema)", section on 'Depression and anxiety disorder'.)
AUTOIMMUNE AND SYSTEMIC DISEASES
Benefit of long-term management on risk for vulvar carcinoma in women with vulvar lichen sclerosus (June 2015)
Vulvar lichen sclerosus is a chronic disease associated with an increased risk for vulvar carcinoma. The findings of a prospective cohort study of 507 women with vulvar lichen sclerosus suggest that topical corticosteroid therapy, used both to achieve disease control and for long-term maintenance treatment, may reduce cancer risk [6]. Women who reported consistent adherence to treatment instructions had a lower incidence of vulvar carcinoma or vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia than women who reported less consistent adherence (0 versus 4.7 percent). In addition, patients who adhered to treatment had better symptom control and reduced risk for vulvar scarring. These findings suggest that consistent treatment rather than an "as needed" approach to the long-term management of vulvar lichen sclerosus may improve patient outcomes. (See "Vulvar lichen sclerosus", section on 'Topical corticosteroids'.)
Effects of rituximab in systemic sclerosis (May 2015)
In patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc), B cell infiltration has been demonstrated within skin and lung biopsies. Earlier case reports suggested that B cell depletion could attenuate skin and lung fibrosis, and now a larger study of 63 SSc patients and 25 matched controls has evaluated the therapeutic effects of rituximab [7]. After a follow-up period of approximately seven months, patients treated with a single course of rituximab demonstrated a significant improvement in the modified Rodnan skin score (mRss). Among SSc patients with interstitial lung disease, rituximab also prevented a further decline in forced vital capacity compared with matched controls. There were no serious adverse events among rituximab-treated patients. However, this study had many limitations, and additional studies are needed to establish the long-term efficacy of rituximab for skin and lung fibrosis in systemic sclerosis before routine use can be recommended. (See "Immunomodulatory and antifibrotic approaches to the treatment of systemic sclerosis (scleroderma)", section on 'Rituxumab'.)
Apremilast for oral ulcers in Behçet’s disease (April 2015)
There remains a need for effective therapy for recurrent oral ulcers in patients with Behçet’s syndrome. Preliminary data suggest that apremilast, an orally administered phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor known to modulate several inflammatory pathways, is beneficial in treating oral ulcers. A randomized, phase II trial including over 100 patients with Behçet’s syndrome found that patients who received apremilast had a significant reduction in the number of oral ulcers at 12 weeks, as compared with those in the placebo group [8]. There was also a significant reduction in pain from oral ulcers. Nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea were more common than in the placebo group, which is similar to findings seen in previous studies of apremilast for the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Additional studies are needed to determine the long-term efficacy and safety of apremilast for oral ulcers before routine use can be recommended. (See "Treatment of Behçet’s syndrome", section on 'Oral aphthae and genital ulcers'.)
INFECTIONS AND INFESTATIONS
Updated recommendations for pediatric head lice (May 2015)
Pediculosis capitis is a common condition that can lead to physical discomfort and social stigmatization. An update to the 2010 clinical report on head lice published by the American Academy of Pediatrics incorporates new therapies (spinosad and topical ivermectin), clarifies diagnosis and treatment protocols, and provides guidance for the management of children with pediculosis capitis in the school setting [9]. Examples of major points in the update include recommendations that no child should be excluded from school because of head lice or nits and that pyrethroids remain reasonable first-line therapies for primary treatment of pediculosis capitis in communities where resistance to pyrethroids is unproven. (See "Pediculosis capitis", section on 'Pediculicide selection'.)
The efficacy of an inactivated vaccine to prevent zoster (April 2015)
The live attenuated zoster vaccine reduces the risk of herpes zoster with a reported vaccine efficacy of 60 to 70 percent in adults 50 years and older, but it cannot be used in immunocompromised individuals and may have decreased efficacy in adults 70 years and older. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial evaluated the efficacy of HZ/su, an experimental recombinant inactivated zoster vaccine administered in two doses two months apart, among 15,411 adults 50 years and older [10]. After three years of follow-up, the overall vaccine efficacy against herpes zoster was 97.2 percent (95% CI 93.7-99.0), and efficacy among adults 70 years and older was similar to that seen in adults between 50 and 69 years of age. (See "Prevention of varicella-zoster virus infection: Herpes zoster", section on 'Inactivated vaccines'.)
PEDIATRIC DERMATOLOGY
Stevens-Johnson syndrome outbreak associated with M. pneumoniae (August 2015)
Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN) is a rare, severe blistering mucocutaneous reaction, most commonly triggered by medications, characterized by extensive necrosis and detachment of the epidermis and mucosa. Mycoplasma pneumoniae and cytomegalovirus infections are the next most common trigger of SJS/TEN, particularly in children. Between September and November 2013, an outbreak of eight pediatric cases of M. pneumoniae-associated SJS/TEN was reported in Colorado, likely related to high levels of M. pneumoniae infection in the region [11]. All children had severe oropharyngeal mucositis; the conjunctiva was involved in seven children and the genital mucosa in five. (See "Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: Pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis", section on 'Infection'.)
PSORIASIS AND OTHER PAPULOSQUAMOUS DISORDERS
Secukinumab, an anti-IL17A antibody, for psoriatic arthritis (August 2015, MODIFIED August 2015)
Secukinumab, an anti-interleukin (IL)-17A antibody, is available for the treatment of psoriasis in the United States and other countries, and has been evaluated for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) using various routes of administration and dosing regimens. In a multicenter randomized trial, involving almost 400 patients with active PsA, secukinumab (300, 150, or 75 mg administered subcutaneously weekly for four weeks and every four weeks thereafter, consistent with the regimen for psoriasis) was superior to placebo in achieving significant improvement in joint and skin disease, and in physical function and quality of life [12]. Responses by weeks 12 to 16 were similar to those at week 24 (ACR20 responses of 54, 51, and 29 versus 15 percent), and benefit was sustained at 52 weeks. The drug was well-tolerated and may have a future role in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis. (See "Treatment of psoriatic arthritis", section on 'IL-17 blockade'.)
Comparative efficacy of secukinumab and ustekinumab for plaque psoriasis (July 2015)
Secukinumab, a fully human anti-interleukin-17A monoclonal antibody, is a highly effective new treatment for psoriasis that was superior to etanercept in earlier trials. In the first randomized trial to compare secukinumab with ustekinumab, another established psoriasis therapy, secukinumab was more effective than ustekinumab for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis [13]. Safety profiles for the two drugs were similar. The expanding literature on the comparative efficacy of psoriasis therapies will provide valuable information for therapeutic decision making. (See "Treatment of psoriasis", section on 'Secukinumab'.)
Phase III trial support for oral tofacitinib for plaque psoriasis (July 2015)
Oral therapy for psoriasis is advantageous because of the ease of administration compared with topical medications, injected or infused medications, and phototherapy. Tofacitinib, an oral janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, is under investigation for the treatment of psoriasis. A phase III trial that compared two different doses of tofacitinib with etanercept and placebo found that the higher dose of tofacitinib (10 mg twice daily) was superior to placebo and non-inferior to etanercept in the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis [14]. Other phase III randomized trials also support the efficacy of tofacitinib therapy [15]. Tofacitinib represents a potential addition to the armamentarium for psoriasis therapy. (See "Treatment of psoriasis", section on 'Future therapies'.)
Risk for vascular complications of diabetes in patients with psoriasis (June 2015)
Psoriasis may be associated with increased risk for vascular complications of diabetes. A retrospective cohort study that compared risk for microvascular and macrovascular complications in diabetic patients with psoriasis with risk for these complications in diabetic patients without psoriasis found a modest increase in risk for both types of complications in patients with psoriasis [16]. Additional study is needed to confirm these findings. (See "Comorbid disease in psoriasis", section on 'Implications'.)
SKIN CANCER
Sonidegib approved for advanced basal cell carcinoma (July 2015)
Targeted inhibition of the Hedgehog pathway has antitumor activity against advanced basal cell carcinoma. Based upon the results of a phase II trial [17], sonidegib was approved at a dose of 200 mg orally once a day by the US Food and Drug Administration for patients with locally advanced basal cell carcinoma that has recurred following surgery or radiation therapy, or who are not candidates for surgery or radiation therapy [18]. Sonidegib provides an additional treatment option for these patients. (See "Systemic treatment of advanced cutaneous squamous and basal cell carcinomas", section on 'Sonidegib'.)
Weak association between citrus fruit and melanoma (July 2015)
An analysis of data from over 100,000 individuals participating in the Nurse’s Health Study found a modest 36 percent increase in melanoma risk associated with high dietary intake of citrus fruit or juice, after adjusting for known risk factors for melanoma, such as family history of melanoma, phenotypic characteristics, number of nevi, and lifetime number of blistering sunburns [19]. A potential explanation for this association is that citrus fruits are a source of psoralens, chemical compounds present in plants known to be photosensitizers. However, the results of this study need further confirmation, because, given the small increase in risk, residual confounding cannot be excluded. In the meanwhile, changes in dietary advice to the public are not warranted. (See "Risk factors for the development of melanoma", section on 'Other proposed risk factors'.)
Melanoma incidence in the United States (June 2015)
A report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention indicates that melanoma incidence rates doubled in the United States over the three decades from 1982 to 2011, while the mortality rates remained constant over time [20]. The annual number of cases is expected to double over the next 15 years. Based upon findings from SunSmart, an Australian community-wide skin cancer prevention program designed to raise awareness, change personal behaviors, and influence institutional policy and practices, the report estimates that a comprehensive skin cancer prevention program in the United States could prevent 20 percent of melanoma cases between 2020 and 2030. (See "Risk factors for the development of melanoma", section on 'Incidence'.)
Topical 5-fluorouracil for the long-term control of actinic keratoses (May 2015)
Topical 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is used as a field treatment in patients with multiple actinic keratoses (AKs) and may be effective for the long-term control of AKs. In a randomized trial, 932 participants with multiple AKs on the face and ears were treated with 5% 5-FU cream or vehicle twice daily for four weeks and followed-up for an average time of 2.6 years [21]. Compared with the control group, patients in the 5-FU group had a significantly higher rate of complete clearance at six months and fewer AKs at 42 months. (See "Treatment of actinic keratosis", section on 'Topical 5-fluorouracil'.)
SURGICAL AND COSMETIC DERMATOLOGY
Effect of needle diameter on patient discomfort during facial injection of botulinum toxin (September 2015)
Although previous data on the impact of injection needle diameter on patient discomfort has been equivocal, studies evaluating this issue have had various methodological flaws. A small randomized trial designed to minimize such flaws found that patients receiving facial injections of botulinum toxin A for forehead wrinkles were less likely to experience clinically significant pain when injected with a 32-gauge needle than with a 30-gauge needle [22]. This finding suggests that use of a smaller diameter needle may benefit patients who experience significant pain during facial injections. (See "Overview of botulinum toxin for cosmetic indications", section on 'During treatment'.)
Cyanoacrylate glue for the ablation of incompetent superficial veins (March 2015)
Several methods are available for the ablation of incompetent superficial veins. A system that ablates the treated vein using a cyanoacrylate adhesive agent has been approved for use in the United States [23]. The procedure is performed like radiofrequency and laser ablation, but without the need for tumescent anesthesia. In a randomized trial comparing this system with radiofrequency ablation, short-term outcomes at three months were similar [24]. Longer term follow-up is needed to determine the durability of the results. (See "Liquid, foam, and glue sclerotherapy techniques for the treatment of lower extremity veins", section on 'Cyanoacrylate glue'.)
OTHER DERMATOLOGY
Afamelanotide for protoporphyria (August 2015)
Erythropoietic protoporphyria (EPP) and X-linked protoporphyria (XLP) are cutaneous porphyrias that present in childhood with painful, non-blistering photosensitivity within minutes of sun exposure. Affected individuals must avoid sunlight, often with substantial reduction in their quality of life. Afamelanotide is a new therapy for EPP and XLP that is administered as a subcutaneous implant every other month. The mechanism involves increased melanin production; there are no effects on porphyrin levels. Two multicenter randomized trials in adults with EPP or XLP (168 patients total) found that afamelanotide substantially reduced photosensitivity and improved sunlight tolerance, with minimal toxicities [25]. Thus, for adults with EPP or XLP, we suggest afamelanotide. This therapy is available in Europe but not in the United States. Dosing and safety data in children have not been reported. (See "Erythropoietic protoporphyria and X-linked protoporphyria", section on 'Afamelanotide'.)
Eosinophilia during prolonged antibiotic therapy (June 2015)
Eosinophilia is not uncommon in patients receiving prolonged intravenous (IV) antibiotics, but the prevalence and significance has not been extensively studied. In a prospective cohort study of 824 patients receiving prolonged intravenous antibiotic therapy, eosinophilia developed in 25 percent, appearing at a median of 15 days of therapy and peaking at a median absolute count of 726/mL (500 to 8610/mL) [26]. Although most patients with eosinophilia completed their courses without complications, one-third developed a hypersensitivity reaction involving rash or hepatic or renal involvement. Medication-associated eosinophilia does not mandate discontinuation of therapy but warrants close monitoring for evidence of hypersensitivity and consideration of alternative medications that could be substituted without compromising care. (See "Approach to the patient with unexplained eosinophilia", section on 'Medications and over the counter remedies'.)
Sunscreen use among adults in the United States (June 2015)
Although regular sunscreen use is a key message of sun-safety campaigns worldwide, data on the pattern of sunscreen use in the general population are limited. In the United States, a survey of over 4000 adults found that approximately 14 percent of men and 30 percent of women regularly used sunscreen on the face and other exposed skin when outside in the sun for more than one hour [27]. Regular use of sunscreen was associated with having sun-sensitive skin, higher annual household income, performing aerobic activity, and having children younger than 18. However, the use of sun protection measures other than sunscreen (eg, wearing hat or protective clothing) was not investigated. The results of this study indicate a need for sun-safety interventions targeting men, individuals with a lower perceived susceptibility to sun damage, and those for whom cost may be a barrier to sunscreen use. (See "Selection of sunscreen and sun-protective measures", section on 'Patterns of use'.)
Use of UpToDate is subject to the Subscription and License Agreement.

REFERENCES

  1. Plovanich M, Weng QY, Mostaghimi A. Low Usefulness of Potassium Monitoring Among Healthy Young Women Taking Spironolactone for Acne. JAMA Dermatol 2015; 151:941.
  2. Werfel T, Heratizadeh A, Niebuhr M, et al. Exacerbation of atopic dermatitis on grass pollen exposure in an environmental challenge chamber. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2015; 136:96.
  3. Sigurgeirsson B, Boznanski A, Todd G, et al. Safety and efficacy of pimecrolimus in atopic dermatitis: a 5-year randomized trial. Pediatrics 2015; 135:597.
  4. Legendre L, Barnetche T, Mazereeuw-Hautier J, et al. Risk of lymphoma in patients with atopic dermatitis and the role of topical treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2015; 72:992.
  5. Cheng CM, Hsu JW, Huang KL, et al. Risk of developing major depressive disorder and anxiety disorders among adolescents and adults with atopic dermatitis: a nationwide longitudinal study. J Affect Disord 2015; 178:60.
  6. Lee A, Bradford J, Fischer G. Long-term Management of Adult Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus: A Prospective Cohort Study of 507 Women. JAMA Dermatol 2015.
  7. Jordan S, Distler JH, Maurer B, et al. Effects and safety of rituximab in systemic sclerosis: an analysis from the European Scleroderma Trial and Research (EUSTAR) group. Ann Rheum Dis 2015; 74:1188.
  8. Hatemi G, Melikoglu M, Tunc R, et al. Apremilast for Behçet's syndrome--a phase 2, placebo-controlled study. N Engl J Med 2015; 372:1510.
  9. Devore CD, Schutze GE, Council on School Health and Committee on Infectious Diseases, American Academy of Pediatrics. Head lice. Pediatrics 2015; 135:e1355.
  10. Lal H, Cunningham AL, Godeaux O, et al. Efficacy of an adjuvanted herpes zoster subunit vaccine in older adults. N Engl J Med 2015; 372:2087.
  11. Olson D, Watkins LK, Demirjian A, et al. Outbreak of Mycoplasma pneumoniae-Associated Stevens-Johnson Syndrome. Pediatrics 2015; 136:e386.
  12. McInnes IB, Mease PJ, Kirkham B, et al. Secukinumab, a human anti-interleukin-17A monoclonal antibody, in patients with psoriatic arthritis (FUTURE 2): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2015.
  13. Thaçi D, Blauvelt A, Reich K, et al. Secukinumab is superior to ustekinumab in clearing skin of subjects with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: CLEAR, a randomized controlled trial. J Am Acad Dermatol 2015; 73:400.
  14. Bachelez H, van de Kerkhof PC, Strohal R, et al. Tofacitinib versus etanercept or placebo in moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis: a phase 3 randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2015; 386:552.
  15. Papp KA, Menter MA, Abe M, et al. Tofacitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor, for the treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis: results from two, randomised, placebo-controlled, Phase 3 trials. Br J Dermatol 2015.
  16. Armstrong AW, Guérin A, Sundaram M, et al. Psoriasis and risk of diabetes-associated microvascular and macrovascular complications. J Am Acad Dermatol 2015; 72:968.
  17. Migden MR, Guminski A, Gutzmer R, et al. Treatment with two different doses of sonidegib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic basal cell carcinoma (BOLT): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2015; 16:716.
  18. http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm455862.htm (Accessed on July 26, 2015).
  19. Wu S, Han J, Feskanich D, et al. Citrus Consumption and Risk of Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2015; 33:2500.
  20. Guy GP Jr, Thomas CC, Thompson T, et al. Vital signs: melanoma incidence and mortality trends and projections - United States, 1982-2030. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2015; 64:591.
  21. Pomerantz H, Hogan D, Eilers D, et al. Long-term Efficacy of Topical Fluorouracil Cream, 5%, for Treating Actinic Keratosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Dermatol 2015; 151:952.
  22. Alam M, Geisler A, Sadhwani D, et al. Effect of Needle Size on Pain Perception in Patients Treated With Botulinum Toxin Type A Injections: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Dermatol 2015; :1.
  23. http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm435082.htm (Accessed on March 19, 2015).
  24. Morrison N, Gibson K, McEnroe S, et al. Randomized trial comparing cyanoacrylate embolization and radiofrequency ablation for incompetent great saphenous veins (VeClose). J Vasc Surg 2015; 61:985.
  25. Langendonk JG, Balwani M, Anderson KE, et al. Afamelanotide for Erythropoietic Protoporphyria. N Engl J Med 2015; 373:48.
  26. Blumenthal KG, Youngster I, Rabideau DJ, et al. Peripheral blood eosinophilia and hypersensitivity reactions among patients receiving outpatient parenteral antibiotics. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2015.
  27. Holman DM, Berkowitz Z, Guy GP Jr, et al. Patterns of sunscreen use on the face and other exposed skin among US adults. J Am Acad Dermatol 2015; 73:83.
Topic 87552 Version 4761.0